Pinellas County rent burden by ZIP area (2020-2024)

Compiled by Ryszard (Richard) Cieplechowicz

The 47 selected ZIP Code Tabulation Areas assigned to Pinellas County with usable estimates, ranked by the share of renter households paying 30% or more of income on gross rent. Figures are Census Bureau 2020-2024 five-year estimates; rows marked "small sample" have a thin renter base and should be read with their margins of error.

ZCTARenters cost-burdened 30%+Severely burdened 50%+Median gross rentMedian household incomeMedian rent as % of incomeSmall sample
34681100.0%0.0%n/an/an/ayes
3468475.7%45.9%$1,854$72,14530.8%
3371273.6%43.5%$1,623$60,45032.2%
3370771.5%41.3%$1,605$69,95127.5%
3371570.8%29.5%$2,680$102,78231.3%
3376068.9%34.0%$1,631$69,59628.1%
3377768.8%28.8%$1,729$86,37524.0%
3468368.2%36.8%$1,748$92,88522.6%
3376768.0%46.5%$2,539$117,42525.9%
3371167.4%43.2%$1,897$66,54034.2%
3377067.0%33.1%$1,604$59,81532.2%
3468566.9%28.6%$1,990$94,68825.2%
3375666.7%38.7%$1,557$61,87230.2%
3469866.1%31.2%$1,691$74,07827.4%
3378264.6%21.5%$1,879$66,46133.9%
3376464.5%28.6%$1,797$67,25632.1%
3467763.8%31.4%$1,485$93,47419.1%
3375562.1%36.6%$1,462$62,88627.9%
3370361.5%26.4%$1,833$95,22423.1%
3370161.0%36.3%$1,711$73,54227.9%
3377660.0%34.4%$2,544$105,33729.0%
3375959.9%34.5%$1,890$67,49233.6%
3370858.7%40.9%$1,987$82,50028.9%
3377458.2%29.9%$1,545$79,13923.4%
3377258.1%27.5%$1,608$73,58626.2%
3371057.5%22.4%$1,577$78,61124.1%
3370256.9%23.8%$1,465$67,46326.1%
3376356.7%28.4%$1,497$54,79432.8%
3376556.6%23.3%$1,641$69,19928.5%
3378156.2%30.2%$1,343$57,78527.9%
3377855.2%24.0%$1,811$65,35533.3%
3468955.1%32.5%$1,289$74,85420.7%
3371454.9%31.6%$1,373$47,48734.7%
3370454.7%24.7%$1,495$107,88916.6%
3377154.5%27.2%$1,436$59,99328.7%
3376153.7%21.5%$1,806$74,72829.0%
3370953.3%29.1%$1,479$53,50133.2%
3370552.4%28.4%$1,526$73,02725.1%
3371352.4%24.3%$1,497$74,70724.0%
3370651.7%26.0%$1,733$104,35919.9%
3377351.3%18.9%$1,679$76,86726.2%
3378550.4%24.8%$1,948$101,35623.1%
3371649.9%21.9%$1,809$75,22628.9%
3376245.2%17.1%$1,792$87,46124.6%
3468841.8%29.4%$1,429$112,09115.3%yes
3469534.6%11.8%$1,707$95,23821.5%
3378622.9%11.4%$3,501$163,12525.8%yes

Region-wide context: all four counties ranked by rent burden. Methods: rent burden study. Archived data: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22940611.

Included rows can still have small bases, as the flags show. Usable does not mean precise. This county-assigned ZCTA selection is not a complete countywide estimate; read the values with their sampling limits.